I remember seeing the TV series award-winning 'breaking bad' in Albuquerque, New Mexico chemistry teacher, Walter White, masterfully portrayed by Bryn Cranston, who decides to embark on a life of crime with a methamphetamine drug with one of its alumni used, criminal leads to a dark underworld where connections for he and his partner were very learned in...
The raison d ' être
Walter was diagnosed with stage III. He said that he has only 2 years before the deadly disease finally gets to live, tracks that you want to make this life of immorality because it is A lot of money as security for his wife and teenagers cerebral palsy suffering son.
Do I mean all this?
It is not threatening to the diagnosis of the doctor Walter Eingeständnis debt on behalf of which Center physician failure to pass with a cure for cancer in spite of billions for research for many years.
Let's take a look at the facts
The first thing we must have is the fact that the cancer was in 1900 virtually unknown during the turn of the century in the United States. In the early 1950's, the cancer was about 150 cases per 100,000 population. He rose early cancer of the years 70 deaths to 163 per 100,000 inhabitants, which after much concern made declare then US President Richard Nixon a "war on cancer".
Consequentially, tons of government backed funding got poured into cancer research which escalated over the years. In spite of the billions poured in the result is not only a failure to find a cure but also the cancer deaths figures have increased over the years:
The following is taken from 'Vital Statistics of the US Volume II 1967 - 1992' showing the number of cancer deaths per 100,000 population in the US.
1967 - 157.2
1970 - 162.9
1982 - 187.3
1987 - 198.2
1988 - 198.4
1989 - 201.9
1990 - 203.2
1991 - 204.1
1992 - 204.1
Then, moving to 1997 the number of cancer deaths per 100,000 rose to 220. A further rise was recorded in the year 2000 to 321 (CA Journal for Cancer Clinicians Jan 1997 & OECD Health Data 2010).
I bet you haven't seen these figures in mainstream media. That's because certain individuals don't want you to know this: Since Nixon's war on cancer the equation is simple:
More cancer research = More cancer!
Today's most recent figures show that the cancer death rate has slightly decreased by about 1.5%. Some cancers such as liver and pancreatic cancer have increased, but there have been more cancer incidences. That means more people are getting cancer but living longer.
The 1.5% decrease claim has been questioned by some saying that the decrease could be explained by changing the way the death rate is interpreted and doesn't stand the test of scrutiny... Also, it has been said that one (besides others) explanation for the decline is due to the reduction in young people smoking.
Either way the cancer establishment have failed to look at some major factors that could reduce cancer and in my opinion will never produce significant breakthroughs to lower death and incidents rates if continually ignored.
I've documented these 4 major factors in other articles and they are: Nutrition, outlook on life (the mind, body and spirit connection), exercise and avoidance of toxins, all of which can not only be used for cancer prevention but also in therapies to eradicate the disease...
The saddest thing is that the above 4 factors do not constitute a multibillion dollar industry and I doubt if their effectiveness will ever be seriously considered by the medical establishment's money making model. So, given this, doctors, active for and on behalf of the establishment will not take this route with you and give sound advice related to these vita life-saving factors.
That means, if you are suffering from cancer you're on your own. You have to do your own research make decisions that may have to go against peer pressure and the establishment's bullying tactics... Some people have. I've seen and met a few that have successfully cured themselves of cancer, but be very cautious, judge what's appropriate for you and remember your health and well-being is ultimately up to you.
The raison d ' être
Walter was diagnosed with stage III. He said that he has only 2 years before the deadly disease finally gets to live, tracks that you want to make this life of immorality because it is A lot of money as security for his wife and teenagers cerebral palsy suffering son.
Do I mean all this?
It is not threatening to the diagnosis of the doctor Walter Eingeständnis debt on behalf of which Center physician failure to pass with a cure for cancer in spite of billions for research for many years.
Let's take a look at the facts
The first thing we must have is the fact that the cancer was in 1900 virtually unknown during the turn of the century in the United States. In the early 1950's, the cancer was about 150 cases per 100,000 population. He rose early cancer of the years 70 deaths to 163 per 100,000 inhabitants, which after much concern made declare then US President Richard Nixon a "war on cancer".
Consequentially, tons of government backed funding got poured into cancer research which escalated over the years. In spite of the billions poured in the result is not only a failure to find a cure but also the cancer deaths figures have increased over the years:
The following is taken from 'Vital Statistics of the US Volume II 1967 - 1992' showing the number of cancer deaths per 100,000 population in the US.
1967 - 157.2
1970 - 162.9
1982 - 187.3
1987 - 198.2
1988 - 198.4
1989 - 201.9
1990 - 203.2
1991 - 204.1
1992 - 204.1
Then, moving to 1997 the number of cancer deaths per 100,000 rose to 220. A further rise was recorded in the year 2000 to 321 (CA Journal for Cancer Clinicians Jan 1997 & OECD Health Data 2010).
I bet you haven't seen these figures in mainstream media. That's because certain individuals don't want you to know this: Since Nixon's war on cancer the equation is simple:
More cancer research = More cancer!
Today's most recent figures show that the cancer death rate has slightly decreased by about 1.5%. Some cancers such as liver and pancreatic cancer have increased, but there have been more cancer incidences. That means more people are getting cancer but living longer.
The 1.5% decrease claim has been questioned by some saying that the decrease could be explained by changing the way the death rate is interpreted and doesn't stand the test of scrutiny... Also, it has been said that one (besides others) explanation for the decline is due to the reduction in young people smoking.
Either way the cancer establishment have failed to look at some major factors that could reduce cancer and in my opinion will never produce significant breakthroughs to lower death and incidents rates if continually ignored.
I've documented these 4 major factors in other articles and they are: Nutrition, outlook on life (the mind, body and spirit connection), exercise and avoidance of toxins, all of which can not only be used for cancer prevention but also in therapies to eradicate the disease...
The saddest thing is that the above 4 factors do not constitute a multibillion dollar industry and I doubt if their effectiveness will ever be seriously considered by the medical establishment's money making model. So, given this, doctors, active for and on behalf of the establishment will not take this route with you and give sound advice related to these vita life-saving factors.
That means, if you are suffering from cancer you're on your own. You have to do your own research make decisions that may have to go against peer pressure and the establishment's bullying tactics... Some people have. I've seen and met a few that have successfully cured themselves of cancer, but be very cautious, judge what's appropriate for you and remember your health and well-being is ultimately up to you.
No comments:
Post a Comment